Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Behavioral and Social Cognitive Views of Learning

According to Ormrod, behaviorism is defined as, "Theoretical perspective in which learning and behavior are described and explained in terms of stimulus-response relationships" (Ormrod 285).  She lists five perspectives that are the backbone of any behaviorist teacher.


  • "People's behaviors are largely the result of their experience with environmental stimuli" (286).
    • I like this because it can involve changing the environment that your students are in to help them behave in the way you want and to learn.
  • "Learning involves a behavior change" (286).
    • This means we can only see physical changes in behavior, not mental changes.  We cannot observe if the student has learned anything until they, maybe, take a test or quiz or something.
  • "Learning involves forming associations among stimuli and responses" (286).
    • Learning involves observable events: X leads to Y.
  • "Learning is most likely to take place when stimuli and responses occur close together in time" (287).
    • I understood this as one thing leading immediately to the next.  If I have a class that is rowdy and won't calm down, I could use something more drastic like smacking the podium with a mallet.  I remember a teacher doing that in a class in high school and each time she would grab the mallet, we would all shut up because we FEARED the noise it made.  Plus, we feared her in general.
  • "Many species of animals, including human beings, learn in similar ways" (287).
    • Much research has been done that shows that animal behavior is helpful in understanding human behavior tendencies.  Hmm, I like to think of myself as higher than some lab animal personally.
In my class, I would define successful mastery of my lesson objectives through the following ways.  I would need to design an assignment that allows me to judge their behavior in class.  A type of pop quiz would be a good way (well for me) to start a class off to see how much they remember from the last class.  I would look around the class to see their behaviors and actions.  If I notice a lot of head turning and upset faces, I know that they aren't doing their work.  If they aren't really confident in their answers then I know they don't understand the material either.  For those that do well, I would positively reinforce them with rewards.  For those who did not do so well, I could maybe move them to the front of the room, away from their peers so they don't feel distracted and cause problems.

2 comments:

  1. I am interested to know what your opinion of the teacher you feared in high school was? Fear can be a scary concept; is there a fine line that we should toe when it comes to respect and fear? Also, does training our students with a mallet or whistle lead to negative outcomes?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are you leaning towards behaviorism as your learning theory? You didn't mention how you would define mastery from a social cognitive viewpoint.

    ReplyDelete